Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Hmmm OLD vs NEW

September 22, 2018 07:14AM
i can vouch for the cz3d! does fine for supposedly 'outdated" technology!
still finding deep good stuff after all these years!..they ain't exactly giving
them away,but at least the "simplicity" of this detector still works!,,i'm just saying'

(h.h.!)
j.t.
Subject Author Views Posted

Old Vs New .. Do YOU have some 'standards' by which you compare performance?

Monte 208 September 17, 2018 08:21AM

Re: Old Vs New .. Do YOU have some 'standards' by which you compare performance?

Hombre 129 September 20, 2018 09:36PM

'Yep' to your comments and I'll add a little.

Monte 108 September 21, 2018 05:41AM

Re: Old Vs New .. Do YOU have some 'standards' by which you compare performance?

WM6 145 September 19, 2018 05:24AM

'Thank You' WM6 for your response to this topic.

Monte 113 September 19, 2018 07:48AM

Re: 'Thank You' WM6 for your response to this topic.

WM6 122 September 20, 2018 06:36AM

Hmmm OLD vs NEW

OregonGregg 114 September 21, 2018 06:47AM

Re: Hmmm OLD vs NEW

WM6 108 September 21, 2018 10:06AM

Re: Hmmm OLD vs NEW

jmaryt 96 September 22, 2018 07:14AM

Re: Hmmm OLD vs NEW

OregonGregg 127 September 22, 2018 06:45AM

Re: Hmmm OLD vs NEW

WM6 102 September 23, 2018 04:33AM

Re: Hmmm OLD vs NEW

jmaryt 121 September 22, 2018 07:18AM

Re: Old Vs New .. Do YOU have some 'standards' by which you compare performance?

jmaryt 144 September 18, 2018 01:25AM

Standards by which to compare? Detector University . .

Rich (Utah) 173 September 17, 2018 05:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 31
Record Number of Users: 13 on January 18, 2018
Record Number of Guests: 302 on March 10, 2018