Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Zincoln's repaired reply. (I hope you don't mind.)

February 21, 2016 05:37PM
Quote
Monte
Quite an impressive way to start the new year off, to be sure. Hopefully you'll have weather and time to get more hunting in before February draws to a close. I know we have some chilly starts this past three days and will through next Saturday, but it will be mostly sunny to sunny every day with highs in the mid-to-upper 50's, and I love this start-up of early spring weather. Soon it won't be too cool for a morning start.

It has virtually quite freezing here, so other than rain, i think we are good to go. I never stopped this winter.


Quote
Monte
Quote
Zincoln
Thought this was interesting enough to share. These were found in post 1900 sites in the Pacific NW - nothing with exceptional age and all easily accessible and detectable.
Yes, there are still a few good keepers out there in post 1900 locations, and it's up to us to find the ones that haven't been heavily hunted through the years. Gregg and I have worked one site that is kind of 'mid' 1900's with some success, but there is a lot of iron and other junk to deal with. At least we have each recovered silver to start the year.


Quote
Zincoln
Group of Feb goodies was found with my V3i and a mix of the 10" DD coil and the 6x8 SEF coil - only a couple of items over 4" which included the Bell of the Ball (s mint) at about 6". Second photo was found with an M6 and 950 coil at about 1".
I still make most good coin finds in the 4" or shallower depth range with occasional keepers in the 4" to 6" range. Nice Morgan Dollar! The last few I found with a White's rang up with a VDI or '94' and the last with a Teknetics Omega 8000 was also a '94' so your dollar might have had a slightly lower reading because there was a lower-conductive 'V' nickel beside it that you missed? thinking Better hurry back there and check! winking smiley

Believe me i looked! May be that the 6" depth and 30 deg angle modified the VDI reading.


Quote
Monte
Quote
Zincoln
The key to my finds in the last year has been to operate in Mixed Mode Pro which allows me to see all incoming signals coming (not requiring some preset number of good hits in a particular range to ring up). Doing so allow me to see both when i have good and bad targets in close proximity to one another, even when the VDI is way off due to masking.
For a long, long time I have enjoyed using good working models with a '0' Disc. or very low rejection setting to still hear nails and other iron, but 'classify' the non-ferrous targets, even partially masked, with Tone ID, combined with audio response nuances and maybe a hint from the visual display on occasion.

My favorite Tesoro models, as shown below, are above nail rejection at their minimum setting, but their circuitry design does an excellent job of working in dense iron nail environments. My other favorites in my arsenal also allow a very low Discrimination setting whereby I can hear all targets, ferrous and non-ferrous, or increase the Discrimination as little or as much as I want. Usually I don't, and I rely on either the 2-Tone or 3-Tone audio search modes that have the low-tone Iron Audio response to alert me. winking smiley


Quote
Zincoln
Just for fun, the Sterling Victorian Earring was not masked, but because of design rang up between iron 0 and about 25 and was very intermittent on the M6, just not a clean signal. Sometimes you just have a feeling.
Odd shapes and mixed metal composition can sure trick a detector, and I wouldn't be surprised if part of that is made of some ferrous material. I found a lot of small jewelry that looked good, produced a very fluctuating read-out, and parts of it would be more attracted to a magnet than hot babes are to me. (Darn it!)

You got me curious after i finished choking on my drink while laughing, so i grabbed a magnet. Not an ounce of magnetism, kinda like me;-)


Quote
Monte
Quote
Zincoln
Left out a 1916 Buff from the photo. Enjoy the Spring like weather than is showing up!
Back in the latter '60s and through the '70s I used to find quite a few Buffalo Nickels in all sorts of urban locations. Older parks and schools, old parking strips and around parking meters and old pay-type phone booths, playgrounds, picnic areas, etc. Then as a lot of the older coins in modern places started to dry up and thin out, my Buffalo Nickel recoveries have sure dwindled.

In the past 33 years I have found more 'V' Nickels than Buffalo Nickels, and I have also found more Shield Nickels than Buffalo Nickels. Of course that might be partly due to the choice of sites I search, but I have Coin Hunted a lot of urban areas where I anticipated a Buffalo Nickels, but I think most of those herds were thinned out by a lot of us 'Buffalo Hunters' from the early detecting era.

Get out more and keep the good finds coming!

Monte

I have to say that i don't find many older nickels, though i know what to listen for when they are there. I've only hit three spots where i found multiple buffs or Vs, and the rest were random 1-off finds. I like the old nickels, and look forward to finding a Shield variety. Afraid like many other old coins, they've fallen victim to a previous coil.

Zincoln



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/22/2016 09:56PM by Monte.
Subject Author Views Posted

February Success Attachments

zincoln 752 February 21, 2016 09:55AM

Re: February Success

obrienc 366 October 21, 2016 09:22PM

Re: February Success

Elbert 460 February 23, 2016 10:13AM

Re: February Success

desertsmith 413 February 22, 2016 10:14PM

Great stuffthumbs up

Hombre 398 February 21, 2016 07:15PM

And you still have 8 days to go this month!

Monte 531 February 21, 2016 04:11PM

Zincoln's repaired reply. (I hope you don't mind.)

zincoln 590 February 21, 2016 05:37PM

Wow, Congrats.

OregonGregg 432 February 21, 2016 11:09AM

Re: Wow, Congrats.

zincoln 411 February 21, 2016 11:50AM

Congrats on the big silver

Rich (Utah) 328 October 20, 2016 04:10PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 11
Record Number of Guests: 182 on September 16, 2016